Independent political news, information and commentary from the Capitol and the State of Minnesota.

GAMC Veto Override Fails On Party Line Vote - But Bill Is Still Alive - VIDEO

March 1, 2010
State Capitol - By Marty Owings

The Minnesota House today attempted to override Governor Tim Pawlenty's (R) veto of the General Assistance Medical Care program. After nearly two hours of debate, the measure was defeated along party lines. The DFL controlled House needed at least three Republicans to support the vote, but none did.

At one point, Republican Larry Howes said he would be willing to vote for an override if negotiations were allowed to continue for 48 hours. DFL Law Makers including the bill's chief author, Erin Murphy said they needed to act today in order to avoid auto-enrollment for GAMC recipients in MN Care, a program they say won't serve the needs of recipients.

MCN Poll Finds 81% Support GAMC Veto Override - Legislature Likely To Take Up Vote Monday

February 28, 2009
State Capitol - By Marty Owings

A Minnesota Capitol News poll shows 81% support for a Legislative override of Governor Tim Pawlenty's (R) veto of General Assistance Medical Care. The poll asked voters, "Should the Legislature override Governor Pawlenty's Veto of GAMC". The poll collected 165 votes during its two day run, starting Saturday February 27th and ending Monday morning March 1st, with the following results:

Yes 145 votes (81%)

No 35 votes (19%)

And then this, late Sunday night - media recieved the following from Andrew Wittenborg, Director of Public Affairs for the DFL House.

"After numerous meetings throughout the weekend between Representatives Murphy, Huntley, Senator Berglin and the Governor's staff, there has been no agreement reached on a GAMC fix. No additional meetings are scheduled between now and tomorrow's floor Session. I would anticipate a vote to override the Governor's veto of GAMC."

Should The Legislature Over Ride Govenor Pawlenty's Veto Of GAMC - Weekend Poll - Vote To See Results

Yes
81% (145 votes)
No
19% (35 votes)
No Opinion
0% (0 votes)
Total votes: 180
5
Your rating: None Average: 5 (1 vote)

First Ever Minnesota Hearing On Same Sex Marriage - Audio and Video Highlights

February 25, 2010
State Capitol - By Marty Owings

Early this week, the first hearing of its kind took place at the Minnesota Capitol. The hearing heard testimony on civil unions, also known as same sex marriage. Law Makers heard and questioned testifiers from both sides of the issue. Many in the LGBT community considered the hearing a watershed moment in their struggle for equality. Here are some audio & video highlights of the hearing:

Here is an interview with Civil Union opponent Professor Teresa Collett:

General Assistance Medical Care - The Audio Files - Law Makers Speak Out

GAMC
February 26, 2010
State Capitol - By Marty Owings

The fight over General Assistance Medical Care has taken some interesting turns in the past week. A bill authored by Rep. Erin Murphy (DFL) with Republican input was passed in the House by a vote of 125 to 9. That vote represented more than 80% of GOP Law Makers who supported the measure. Later that night the Governor used his veto power to kill the bill. The next morning, GOP Law Makers who had previously supported the measure, including the House Minority Leader Kurt Zellers, announced to the media that they were now supporting the Governor's veto.

Senator Steve Dille (R) comments on why he thinks it's politics over principle:
Click Here For The Audio.

Senator Mee Moua (DFL) comments on why she believes the GAMC program will be saved:

Senate Votes to Override Guv's GAMC Veto

February 25, 2010 - State Capitol
By Tanner Curl

In a 45-21 vote along party lines, the state Senate voted to override Gov. Tim Pawlenty's veto of a bill that would allow 30,000 low income individuals continue their coverage under the General Assistance Medical Care.

With the DFL's supermajority in the Senate, the outcome wasn't a surprise, with the real test for an override to take place in the House. In that chamber, DFL leaders will need to convince at least 3 Republicans to cross party lines. According to state Rep. Kurt Zellers, the GOP leader in the House, that isn't going to happen. He's confident that his caucus, although split on the original vote, will tow the party line on the override.

If the override isn't successful, the state will transfer individuals from GAMC to other state health care programs next month.

The House is expected to vote on the override on Monday.

T-Paw to Veto Bonding Bill Tomorrow (Update w/guv's letter)

February 22, 2010 - State Capitol
By Tanner Curl

When Gov. Tim Pawlenty announced his proposed bonding bill in January, he made it clear he wasn't afraid to use a full veto instead of making line-item cuts, as he has in the past. Tonight, he made it clear he wasn't joking around.

In a letter to state Sen. Keith Langseth and state Rep. Alice Hausman, the DFL leads on the bonding bill, Pawlenty wrote, "The people of Minnesota expect us to spend their tax dollars frugally and wisely. This bill does neither." This comes as the Legislature prepares to send a $1 billion bill to the governor, when he asked that the total cost not exceed $725 million.

Read more on this story, including full text of Pawlenty's letter, after the jump.

Candidate Joe Repya Exits Gov's Race with some Parting Shots at the IP

February 22, 2010
Minnesota State Capitol - By Marty Owings

Independence Party Candidate Joe Repya announced on his website Sunday that he was ending his campaign for Governor. Repya states on his website that, "In short, it has become clear to me that, much like the DFL and GOP parties in this state, the IPM fails to stand by its own rules and principles."

I contacted Repya for more details on his decision.

According to Repya, the trouble started last night at a IP Executive Committee meeting when there were several motions being made around a rule change that would have given each IP Candidate access to the coveted party delegate list. He says since he was the only Candidate in the IP who pledged he would abide by the endorsement process, he wasn't happy with the move. Repya says, "They made a rule change driven by one Candidate and I didn't think that was right". Repya wouldn't say who the "one Candidate" was.

Syndicate content